Forgetting the old dog tricks
Guy Kawasaki goes about pattern-seeking and writes about forgetting the dog old tricks in the search of inexperience:Serial entrepreneurs try to prove that their first success wasn’t a fluke. Rather than starting from the basis of technology (“isn’t this cool?”) or customers (“there must be a better way”), the reason for existence is “I’m going to prove that I’m talented.” This is a bull shiitake reason for starting company compared to solving people’s problems or changing the world.
Serial entrepreneurs cannot distinguish between causation and correlation. The root cause of earlier success may have simply been blind, dumb luck, but few people realize this and even fewer will admit. Thus, they have the hollow arrogance of people who just got lucky instead of people who have been truly tested, and arrogance is a bad thing in entrepreneurs.
Serial entrepreneurs are likely to use the same methods again. How can you fault them for using the same methods that made the successful the first time? For example, if they built a high-end computer the first time, they build a high-end computer the NeXt time. If they used dealers the first time, they use dealers the second time. If they gave everything away to get eyeballs and sold the company to a bigger, dumber, richer company, they try try that “business model again.”
Serial entrepreneurs don’t (or can’t) work as hard. When you have a 5,000 square foot house, a second house in Montana, a car made by a company whose name ends in “i,” a spouse, and kids, attitudes change. Indeed, attitudes should change or people never grow up. However, it’s one thing to work to survive and another to work for fulfillment. They can say they’re just as hungry this time, but the point is that no one had to ask if they were hungry the first time.
Serial entrepreneurs don’t get smacked around enough. Life is good as a serial entrepreneur: they walk in, tell people that their last company was sold for a bazillion dollars, and now they’re starting another one, and it’s a privilege and honor to invest. Who’s going to poke holes in their strategy when Sequioia, Kleiner Perkins Tom-Perkins-Adventure-Capitalist Dec-07
, et al are issuing term sheets and ever lesser venture capitalist is sucking up? No one. And that’s too bad because they won’t get anyone checking their sanity. Serial entrepreneurs fill new, unfamiliar roles in their next companies. For example, in the first company the person was an engineer who became the vice-president of engineering who became the CTO. Just because you were good at writing designing chips doesn’t mean you’re CEO material in your next fabulous fabless chip company. As Glenn says in his post, “This means that what I used to be really good at — designing software — I don’t do as much of anymore, and what I never had to learn how to do — manage people – I now do all the time.”
Serial entrepreneurs hire their buddies who were with them the first time. Thus, the entire founding team suffers from all the problems listed above. People who don’t know what they don’t know are few and far between, but a startup needs this kind of people to push the boundaries of what’s possible in what ways. Ignorance is not only bliss; it’s also empowering.
This thread started with a post on TechChrunch by Glenn Kelman (of Redfin fame) who duly noted that the greatest IT successes (Amazon, Apple, Dell, Ebay, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Yahoo!) came from hungry, inexperienced under-30 technology geeks with an itch to scratch.
The history shows that, once you succeed, it becomes very, very hard to forget what it took to succeed and to repeat that success.
Serial Entrepreneur Behavioral Pattern
It appears that the most successful entrepeneurs follow the same path, where they:
- create a startup that scratches your own each (or when you “eat your own dog food” if you’re a software developer writing software for other developers)
- continue to be pationate about it
- scale it
- sell it (or merge it)
- create a new startup in a higher role (tackle higher-level challenges while managing and mentoring youngsters doing the real job)
- try to figure it all out
- (reach this point if they succeed in 6)
It rarely happens that someone is both gifted to learn new tricks in a different role and daring enough to follow one’s intuition and passion to repeat the previous success.
